You could say the Biblical Resonance Analysis Project began a few years ago, when Frances Hogan started sharing audio recordings of her classes on the Book of Heaven. Those early classes were held in her home, where a few people would gather together, and Miss Hogan would read from the Book of Heaven, page by page, entry by entry — explaining and expounding the text, and quoting the biblical passages that portions of the text caused her to recall from memory.
I remember the joy that welled up in my heart upon first encountering those recordings. Eventually, the teaching platform moved from audio recordings to video classes, in which Miss Hogan presented each session live, with the recording available on demand. I believe the audio from both the initial classes and the recorded video sessions is freely available on the DivineWillFamily.org website.
Anyway, as the recordings became available, I downloaded or recorded each one and saved it to my computer and phone. Soon, I had hours upon hours of audio to listen to while working in the garden, driving to work, or running errands. Eventually, I realized that it would be wonderful to have audio transcripts, as they would make the content easier to read and search. Time and money were limiting factors. I didn’t have time to prepare written transcripts, nor the money to hire someone to prepare them. AI transcription services were beginning to come online, but the early ones all carried a steep price tag for the volume of material I had accumulated. Then one day I discovered a startup offering AI transcription at the scale I needed for a modest monthly subscription. Before long, I had transcripts of Miss Hogan’s classes, but I still had a problem. The AI transcripts were somewhat limited in value because they lacked formatting, which made them a real mental burden to read. As a result, they sat on my computer, largely unread, since I had no time to work through them and do the necessary editing and formatting.
March 2026, that all changed with Claude. The transcripts’ lack of formatting is a minor problem for AI, rather than the real stumbling block it is for me. This is what opened the door to the Biblical Resonance Analysis Project. Learning about the biblical resonance of Luisa’s writings started out as an area of personal study. It was something I was working through on my own, hoping that one day it might be organized into a more useful study aid. The possibility that someone else with an interest in the Book of Heaven might find it helpful was more of a passing thought than a potential goal. AI’s analytical capabilities expanded my perspective, enabling the project to go from a conceptual idea without a name to an actionable plan that might offer real benefit for others. Over about ten weeks, I had Claude go through all thirty-six volumes, looking for biblical resonance in the text and analyzing each Hogan transcript. I instructed Claude to compare Miss Hogan’s commentary with the analysis it had independently produced, and to identify any correspondence and deviations.
The analysis Claude performed on the early volumes suffered somewhat from a lack of uniformity, as the analysis methodology was still in development. Recently, I decided that the best way to address the problem was to reprocess the early volumes.
This second pass is being performed using Opus 4.8, a more advanced Claude model with greater analytical capabilities than Sonnet 4.6, which was the model used for the initial first-pass analysis. What follows is the result of this second pass on the diary entry for April 3, 1899, Volume 2, and how it corresponds with Miss Hogan’s commentary on the same entry. I’m not reproducing her words directly, as I lack permission for that, but Claude’s analysis shows where its independent findings align with and diverge from what she taught.